Synopsis.
Name
Bad Coin. Two pieces of work pass the same bar and count the same: the careful one that cost a day and the quick one that cost an hour ... so the quick one is spent and the careful one is kept back, and coin by coin the careful is withdrawn from circulation until all that changes hands is the cheap stuff, stamped exactly as good as the rest.
Arc
The bend is this: treat good and shoddy as equal, and the shoddy will drive the good out. It runs on a common face value and an uncommon cost. The bar accepts both: careful work and quick work clear the same gate, pass the same review, hit the same deadline, and are booked as the same done. Their face value is equal. Their cost is not. The careful one takes longer and asks more, and earns no more for it, so producing it is a pure loss against producing the quick one, and a rational maker spends the cheap coin and hoards the dear: ships the quick version here, and saves the care for somewhere it is paid. Then the good makers, watching the quick win the race on equal terms, convert, because holding to care is now a handicap. The standard sinks to the cheapest thing that still clears the bar, and the body of work fills with coin that passed and will not hold. Grade the work, pay a premium for care, and the good returns to circulation: what you accept as equal is what you will be left holding.
Stakes
Whether care is ever paid for, or only ever accepted. Every plot moves the same way: toward the cheap coin, which clears the bar for less, and away from the dear one, which clears it for more and is thanked no better. The production cannot make a maker give good work for a bad price forever. It can only show that no one was lazy and no one cheated, that every coin passed honestly, and that the one thing that would have kept the good in circulation, a price on the quality the bar refused to grade, was the one thing the bar was built to ignore.
Estate
khai-misfits: the house that holds this production and answers for the whole run.