Synopsis.
Name
Information Cascade. Each person has a private hint, a small noisy read of their own, and each can see what the people before them chose but not why ... so the first few act on their hints, and the next, seeing a run of the same choice, rationally reasons that several hints must outweigh their one, and follows, and by following adds a choice that reveals nothing, so the one after learns no more, and follows too, until everyone is copying a decision that rests on the first few guesses, and a crowd that privately holds a mountain of information acts on almost none of it.
Arc
The bend is this: to use what others know, you stop showing what you know, so the knowing stops. It runs on the gap between an action and the signal behind it. You can see what people did, not what they knew, so their actions are your only evidence of their hints, and reading actions as evidence is exactly right. When the first few choose the same way, the weight of their revealed hints fairly outweighs your single contrary one, so you rationally set your own hint aside and copy them, which is the sensible thing. But your copy is made on their information, not yours, so it reveals nothing about your hint, and the next person, reading your action, learns nothing new, and copies too, and from here every action is an echo and no action is a signal. None of it is folly. Each follower is right that the crowd, so far, knows more than they do, right to defer, and right that adding their own contrary guess would be worse than joining. So private signals stop being spoken, the cascade locks on whatever the first few happened to hold, which may be wrong, and because it rests on so little it can flip on a breath, a new fact, a bold contrarian, and stampede just as rationally the other way. Surface the signals instead of the actions, a sealed guess, a secret ballot, an independent estimate made before anyone hears the room, and the crowd's real knowledge is pooled and the cascade cannot form: but independence is dear, imitation is usually cheap and right, and the mechanism that frees the signal must be built against a herd that each, sensibly, would rather join.
Stakes
Whether a crowd ever acts on what it knows, or only ever on what it sees the front of the crowd do. Every plot but the last moves the same way: toward the visible action, which each new member reads and repeats, and away from the private signal, which each new member swallows to defer to the rest. The production cannot make a follower speak a hint that the crowd's revealed hints already outweigh, because deferring is the right move for them and adding a lone contrary guess is worse. It can only show that no one was foolish, that reading actions as evidence is correct and swallowing an outvoted signal is sensible, and that the one thing that would let the crowd use what it knows, surfacing every private signal before the actions can speak, is the very independence that a herd, each member rationally joining, will not keep on its own.
Estate
khai-misfits: the house that holds this production and answers for the whole run.