Synopsis.
Name
Limits to Growth. An engine drives the growth and the growth compounds: more spend wins more custom, more custom funds more spend, and the record fills with the years it worked. Then a limit binds, quietly and with a delay: the capacity the growth draws on runs short, the custom won begins to leak away, and the net stalls. The one move everyone reaches for is the one that always worked, drive the engine harder ... and the engine is no longer what binds, so the harder push wins nothing, and the leak just widens.
Arc
The bend is this: the lever that made the success is the wrong lever the moment the limit binds, yet it is the only lever the success ever taught. It runs on two loops that cross. One is the engine: a reinforcing loop where growth feeds the effort that makes more growth, and it is real, and it built everything. The other is the limit: a balancing loop where the same growth draws down a finite capacity until, with a delay, the capacity pushes back, and the pushback lands as a leak that gives the growth away. For a long run the engine dominates and the limit is invisible, so when the stall comes it reads as a dip, a thing the engine has always driven through before, and the reflex fires: drive the engine harder. But the binding factor has moved. The engine is not short, the capacity is, so more engine buys more intake into a bucket that leaks faster than before, great effort spent for a net that does not climb. None of it is folly. The driver is right that the engine made every past win, the analyst is right that the engine has always recovered, the delay is real so the misreading is honest, and the limit is nobody's fault, only a finite thing doing what finite things do. The rational response to a stall, when your whole competence is an engine that works, is more engine. Move the effort from the engine to the limit, widen what binds, or ease the engine before the limit is reached, and the growth can breathe again: but that means telling a winning team to stop working the winning lever and pour effort into a thing not yet visibly broken, and you cannot always know in advance which limit will bind, so easing off early can mean leaving real growth unclaimed, the same misreading in reverse.
Stakes
Whether effort is ever spent where the system actually binds, or only ever on the lever that used to work. Every plot but the last moves the same way: toward the engine, which made the success and commands the reflex, and away from the limit, which is what now rules and which no one is watching. The production cannot make the binding factor announce itself, so the stall arrives looking like every dip the engine drove through before, and the rational hand drives harder. It can only show that no one was foolish, that driving the engine is the right move right up until the limit binds and stays the reflex long after, that the delay makes the misreading honest and the limit makes no one to blame, and that the one move that frees the growth, spending effort on the constraint instead of the engine, means working a lever the success never taught and betting on which limit binds before it visibly does.
Estate
khai-misfits: the house that holds this production and answers for the whole run.