Synopsis.
Name
The Tyranny of Small Decisions. Each time, the choice is small and the choice is easy: take the car, not the train, buy from the big store, not the corner one, and each time the small choice is right, the convenient one, the sensible one. No one ever decides to close the line, to empty the high street, to lose the thing. That large question is never put to anyone. It is settled, instead, by the sum of the small choices, which quietly drains the option below the level it needs to survive ... and then it closes, for everyone, including the ones who valued having it and would have paid to keep it, and were never once asked about the whole.
Arc
The bend is this: a big outcome no one would have chosen is settled by small choices each of which was right, because the big choice was never actually made. It runs on a missing forum. Every small decision is put to the chooser, cheap and reversible and correct on its own, and it is made freely and well. The large decision, whether the option should exist at all, is put to no one: there is no moment, no vote, no forum where the whole is weighed, so it is decided by default, as the residue of a thousand small choices that were never about it. None of it is folly or greed. The convenience is real, each small choice is genuinely the better one for the one making it, and no single choice is decisive or wrong. The option dies not because anyone chose to end it but because keeping it alive was never on any ballot, only the small picks that, summed, happened to end it. Put the whole to a real decision, price the option so its value counts, bundle the small choices into the big one they add up to, and the thing can be kept if it is worth keeping: but that means overriding free, sensible, individual choices for an aggregate no one is sure of, you cannot know in advance which sums of small picks will kill something valued until it is already gone and gone for good, and most small decisions should stay small and free, so the cure for a tyranny of small decisions is a tyranny of large ones, and no one can say which aggregates are worth convening before the option they would have saved is past saving.
Stakes
Whether the outcomes that matter are ever actually chosen, or only ever settle as the residue of choices about something else. Every plot but the last moves the same way: toward the small choice, which is put to someone and made well, and away from the large one, which is put to no one and made by default. The production cannot place the aggregate on any ballot, because there is no forum where the whole is weighed, so the big outcome is decided by the sum of small picks that were never about it, and the option dies with no one having chosen to end it. It can only show that no one is foolish or greedy, that each small choice is free and correct and the convenience real, that the loss is authored by no one and assembled by all, and that the one move that would keep a thing worth keeping, convening the aggregate and pricing the option, overrides the free choices it is made of, cannot know in advance which sums will cost something irreplaceable, and risks smothering the small liberties that most small decisions rightly are.
Estate
khai-misfits: the house that holds this production and answers for the whole run.